夢本是由造夢者的腦袋自編自導的故事，夢裡的所有人物情節也是由造夢者的腦袋安排。無論夢裡的故事如何，有一點似乎是必然的：夢總是以造夢者自己第一身的方式呈現，就像造夢者清醒時的親身體驗，而不是像看電影般以局外人姿態觀看故事發展。因此，夢總是有一個自我。這雖然有趣，但也不算太奇怪。在下覺得奇怪的是，既然夢是由造夢者的腦袋自編自導的故事，夢裡除造夢者以外的其他人物角色，其思想、行為及感覺便也應由造夢者的腦袋支配。然而，在下在夢裡的感覺只限於來自夢裡的自我的感覺，完全沒有來自夢裡的其他人物角色的感覺。夢不但總是有一個自我，而且總是不會多於一個自我。舉一個具體的例子，若閣下(有幸)發夢與別人下棋，儘管夢裡這個「別人」也是像閣下夢裡的自我一樣由閣下的腦袋創造，然而閣下或閣下夢裡的自我，在夢裡是不能夠預知這夢裡的「別人」下一步棋將會怎樣的下，就像在現實中跟別人下棋一樣。這怎麼可能？在下曾就此向一些高人請教，得到的「答案」是：我們在夢裡是並不孤獨的。難道夢裡真的可以與人共醉？
以理性哲學而言，這仍是主體客體的問題，不論是真實的客體或的夢裡的虛擬境界，仍是客體的物自身，感到的亦屬於現象而已。如果以佛洛伊德來說，夢裡只是自我潛意識的發揮，可能只有佛洛伊德的夢是可以進入其他人的潛意識領域內。
回覆刪除還有更奇妙的事,你還不知道呢!夢還可以轉移,即是你昨晚的夢境及夢裏的"別人", 這個"別人"昨晚也有和你相似的夢.或你昨晚的夢未完,今晚還有下集大結局.種種這些有關夢的奇怪問題,弗洛伊德都可以給你頗客觀的答案.但我是不喜歡弗洛伊德.抱歉.弗氏有一本很出名兼出位的書叫"解夢",你有興趣買本看看.我就多謝多謝了.
回覆刪除我不否認"潛意識"這三個經典的字是弗氏的發現.
回覆刪除不清楚 Chris 所指的"解夢"，是否與以下"夢的解釋"是同一作品。
回覆刪除http://www.tianyabook.com/mengdejiexi/index.htm
可能在六合彩開收獎前一天，在看到開奬一刻便醒了，開奬後可以看到完整的結果。
Let me first of all, differentiate the so-called self in reality [S(r)]and the so-called self in dreams [S(d)]:-
回覆刪除(a) S(r) cannot order, instruct, demand or summon S(d) to come up and appear to be there in beingness in a dream (if any) before, during, and after sleep.
(b) If it is a dreamless night during sleep, S(d) does not come up.
(c) Therefore S(r) exists as long as one is alive in or not in dreams but S(d)exists only when there is a dream. AND S(r) can be perceived by others while S(d) can only be "perceived" vaguely by S(r) only, nobody else otherwise.
(d) S(r) cannot control S(d), and vice versa, EXCEPT one and only one moment when S(r) dies in a dream during sleep. Then both gone together WITHOUT knowing each other AND WITHOUT the right to ask why.
(e) S(r) appears NOT EQUAL, AND NOT the same as S(d).
Now we come back to discuss what S(r) and S(d) might be so to speak.
(1) S(r) is being recognized because of our sense of awareness of our consciousness. It appears to be crystal clear in existence.
(2) S(d) appears more interesting.
(a) Its recognization is possible under same pre-condition as that for S(r): being alive, but S(r)'s being alive NEVER guarantees S(d)'s appearance or recognized existence.
(b) S(d) requires a dream with the living being. AND further and more mysterious is: S(d) is NOT summoned out by anyone's consciousness. Rather S(d)is FREE to come or go, sometimes being remembered by S(r) for "what S(d) has done ONLY in the dream", but more often, S(d) can be forgotten instantly, as soon as S(r) wakes up.
[BUT ?? Has S(r) existed during the sleep with or without S(d) in the dream??] S(d) NEVER needs to remember and record itself and its acts in all dreams, leaving behind only S(r) in joy or frustration after waking up.]
In other words, S(d) is like a naughty boy committing adventures or misadventures, but never bearing any responsibility or liability except when S(r) dies during sleep with S(d) in the dream. Otherwise the emotional ups or downs after S(d)'s "adventures", only S(r) is to bear (like a mother to feel happy or sorrowful for what her naughty boy has done)!
Judging from above discussions, we have reasonable ground to suspect that:-
EITHER
(a) S(d) is absolutely innocent as a "naughty boy", the same "naughty boy" in every dream;
OR
(b) all the S(d)s in every dream of S(r) are unrelated (i.e. NOT the same "naughty S(d)"). All these S(d)s are S(r)'s subconscious COSPLAYERS (similar to Japanese 動漫畫角色扮演)!